Browsed by
Category: open access

On Collaboration in Scholarly Communication: Opportunities to Normalize Open Access,” by Allyson Rodriguez

On Collaboration in Scholarly Communication: Opportunities to Normalize Open Access,” by Allyson Rodriguez

Librarians play a key role in the scholarly communication cycle. In “Collaboration in Scholarly Communication: Opportunities to Normalize Open Access,” Allyson Rodriguez details how librarians can promote an open access agenda and educate faculty members about scholarly communication practices and pragmatics. Rodriguez suggests that there are three main areas where librarians can promote open access: through outreach and education, highlighting and celebrating, and acquisitions. As Rodriguez writes, “Open access must become a ‘normal’ part of the academic lifestyle,” and in…

Read More Read More

On “Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Communication in Non-Scientific Disciplines,” by Martin Paul Eve

On “Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Communication in Non-Scientific Disciplines,” by Martin Paul Eve

In “Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Communication in Non-Scientific Disciplines,” Martin Paul Eve considers why the humanities and social sciences have lagged behind the STEM disciplines in the widespread acceptance and implementation of open access. He argues that there are social and economic reasons for this gap in uptake. Eve provides the context for shifts in scholarly communication—namely the emergence of the “publish or perish” paradigm and the unsustainable serial subscription model—and suggests that it is a backdrop for both…

Read More Read More

On “The Impact Platform,” by Jefferson Pooley

On “The Impact Platform,” by Jefferson Pooley

In “The Impact Plaform,” Jefferson Pooley weighs the pros and cons of the recent development of websites like The Conversation, which showcases scholarly pieces written for a non-specialist audience. Pooley argues that “The impact platform is flawed and problematic, but also a real gain for open scholarship” (n.p.). This sort of publication venue is “flawed and problematic” for Pooley because it encourages the data-driven reliance on quantitative metrics to judge the value of academic work. Many feel as though this…

Read More Read More

On “Scholarly Communications Shouldn’t Just Be Open, but Non-Profit Too,” by Jefferson Pooley

On “Scholarly Communications Shouldn’t Just Be Open, but Non-Profit Too,” by Jefferson Pooley

Jefferson Pooley argues in “Scholarly Communications Shouldn’t Just Be Open, but Non-Profit Too” that we are at a crossroads when it comes to scholarly communication. There are now two factions working to develop an open science system: for-profit commercial companies and conglomerates, and non-profit presses, journals, and universities. Pooley outlines the major players on both sides, as well as their stakes in scholarly communication. He comes down, decidedly, on the side of non-profit open access publishing. “A publishing ecosystem centred…

Read More Read More

On “Against Capital,” by Stuart Lawson

On “Against Capital,” by Stuart Lawson

In the talk “Against Capital,” Stuart Lawson takes aim at the rhetoric of disruption and newness in scholarly communication. They argue that as long as we continue to subscribe to a capitalist and neoliberal higher education system, we will not achieve true progress in democratizing knowledge or reasserting control over the means of academic production. Lawson goes on to demonstrate how neoliberalism manifests in various elements of higher education. They write, “Neoliberalism in education is not just about the overtly…

Read More Read More

On “How to Scuttle a Scholarly Communication Initiative,” by Dorothea Salo

On “How to Scuttle a Scholarly Communication Initiative,” by Dorothea Salo

In “How to Scuttle a Scholarly Communication Initiative,” Dorothea Salo offers a tongue-in-cheek accounting of the various ways one could systematically destroy a scholarly communication initiative–especially an OA scholarly communication initiative. She writes from the library perspective, but her comments resonate across those who are involved with scholarly communication in any role. Salo’s satire is poignant because it is so relatable; among her suggestions for destroying a schol comm initiative are: not investing in an initiative in the longterm, but…

Read More Read More

On “From the Ground Up: A Group Editorial on the Most Pressing Issues in Scholarly Communication,” by Nicky Agate, Gail Clement, Danny Kingsley, Sam Searle, Leah Vanderjagt, and Jen Waller

On “From the Ground Up: A Group Editorial on the Most Pressing Issues in Scholarly Communication,” by Nicky Agate, Gail Clement, Danny Kingsley, Sam Searle, Leah Vanderjagt, and Jen Waller

“From the Ground Up: A Group Editorial on the Most Pressing Issues in Scholarly Communication” draws together the perspectives of six Editorial Board members from the Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. The contributors were asked to consider the following prompts: What do you see as the most pressing issue(s) in scholarly communication today? What are we doing that’s important? What aren’t we doing that we should be? Who should we be working with? What mountains should we try to…

Read More Read More

On “Policy Recommendations for Open Access to Research Data,” by the RECODE Project Consortium

On “Policy Recommendations for Open Access to Research Data,” by the RECODE Project Consortium

“Policy Recommendations for Open Access to Research Data” is a report and summary of recommendations made by the RECODE Project Consortium. The RECODE Project is a European partnership that explores solutions to open access implementation and effective research data management. Project partners include Trilateral Research & Consulting, the (previously named) e-Humanities group at KNAW, the University of Sheffield, the Stichting LIBER Foundation, the National Documentation Center, the National Research Council of Italy, the Biekinge Institute for Technology, and the Amsterdam…

Read More Read More

On Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy, by Kathleen Fitzpatrick

On Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy, by Kathleen Fitzpatrick

In the oft-cited touchstone book Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy, Kathleen Fitzpatrick examines the current academic publishing system, and outlines its drawbacks and possibilities. She suggests that the current fixation on the printed book monograph, at least in the humanities, needs to change. For Fitzpatrick, the monograph is part of an undead, zombie logic of the academy, as it represents a mandatory but often dysfunctional system of scholarly communication. Beyond the monograph, Fitzpatrick argues, we…

Read More Read More

On “‘Facebook for Academics’: The Convergence of Self-Branding and Social Media Logic on Academia.edu,” by Brooke Erin Duffy and Jefferson D. Pooley

On “‘Facebook for Academics’: The Convergence of Self-Branding and Social Media Logic on Academia.edu,” by Brooke Erin Duffy and Jefferson D. Pooley

In “‘Facebook for Academics’: The Convergence of Self-Branding and Social Media Logic on Academia.edu,” Brooke Erin Duffy and Jefferson D. Pooley examine the popular academic paper sharing site, academia.edu. They argue that academia.edu reflects the self-branding impetus of contemporary scholars, but also feeds the conception that such self-branding is necessary. They frame academia.edu as a classic Silicon Valley start-up, and reveal the significant venture capital that has funded the company since 2008 (over 12.6 million since inception [4]). Duffy and…

Read More Read More